Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280227›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Revealing the differences in aroma of black tea under different drying methods based on GC-MS, GC-O.

Mingxia Lu, Caiyan Sheng, Han Ke, Tiehan Li, Qiuyan Liu, Jixin Zhang, Luqing Li, Yujie Wang, Jingming Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mingxia LuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Caiyan ShengState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Han KeState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Tiehan LiState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Qiuyan LiuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Jixin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Luqing LiState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Yujie WangState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.
Jingming NingState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drying greatly affects the aroma of black tea. In this study, the differences in aroma of black tea under hot-air drying (HD), sun drying (SD), and pan-fired drying (PD) were investigated through quantitative descriptive analysis. Headspace solid-phase microextraction and solvent assisted flavor evaporation combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-olfactory were used to analyze the overall aroma profile of black tea. Aroma extract dilution analysis and odor activity values revealed that 15 aroma-active compounds led to differences in aroma, namely linalool, geraniol, phenylethyl alcohol, phenylacetaldehyde, (

Indexed as

Aroma-active compoundsDrying methodsGC-OSensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39280227
PMCPMC11402106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.