ReviewCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2024
Impact of Magnesium Supplementation on Blood Pressure: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comprehensive Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Diet and Atherosclerosis Prevention: Rethinking the Significance of "The Japan Diet".Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Review
- Association between cumulative biological risk and hypertension in older adults in Korea: a population-based cross-sectional study.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2026Article
- The influence of fluoxetine on the blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Effects of Micronutrients and Heavy Metals on Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Risk in the Face of Environmental Changes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Development of a Biodegradable Green Emitter Chitosan-Based OLED for Implantable Biomedical Devices.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Managing Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Role of Diet and Guideline Recommendations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advances in cardiovascular supplementation: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- The Role of Dietary Magnesium in Cardiovascular Disease.Nutrients · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Conflicting results on the effect of magnesium supplementation on blood pressure have been published in previous meta-analyses; hence, we conducted this umbrella meta-analysis of RCTs to provide a more robust conclusion on its effects. Methods: Four databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched to find pertinent papers published on international scientific from inception up to July 15, 2024. We utilized STATA version 17.0 to carry out all statistical analyses (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, US). The random effects model was used to calculate the overall effect size ES and CI. Findings: Ten eligible review papers with 8610 participants studied the influence of magnesium on SBP and DBP. The pooling of their effect sizes resulted in a significant reduction of SBP (ES = -1.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -1.98, -0.51, Implications: The findings of the present umbrella meta-analysis showed an overall decrease of SBP and DBP with magnesium supplementation, particularly at doses of ≥400 mg/day for ≥12 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.