Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280133›Full record

ArticleSystems & control transactions2024

From Then to Now and Beyond: Exploring How Machine Learning Shapes Process Design Problems.

Burcu Beykal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systems & control transactions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Burcu BeykalDepartment of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.

Funding

Single cell, multi-parametric high throughput platform to classify endocrine disruptor potential of mixturesP42ES027704 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu · 2017 to 2026
$21.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the discovery of the least squares method in 1805 by Legendre and later in 1809 by Gauss, surrogate modeling and machine learning have come a long way. From identifying patterns and trends in process data to predictive modeling, optimization, fault detection, reaction network discovery, and process operations, machine learning became an integral part of all aspects of process design and process systems engineering. This is enabled, at the same time necessitated, by the vast amounts of data that are readily available from processes, increased digitalization, automation, increasing computation power, and simulation software that can model complex phenomena that span over several temporal and spatial scales. Although this paper is not a comprehensive review, it gives an overview of the recent history of machine learning models that we use every day and how they shaped process design problems from the recent advances to the exploration of their prospects.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData-driven analysisHistorical viewProcess synthesisSurrogate modeling

Identifiers

PMID39280133
PMCPMC11395410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.