Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280125›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024

PTCOG international survey of practice patterns and trends in utilization of proton therapy for breast cancer.

J Isabelle Choi, Camille Hardy-Abeloos, Alicia Lozano, Alexandra Hanlon, Carlos Vargas, John H Maduro, Julie Bradley, Birgitte Offersen, Bruce Haffty, Mark Pankuch and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Towards proton therapy guidelines for radiation therapists and dosimetrists: A scoping review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

J Isabelle ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Camille Hardy-AbeloosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA.
Alicia LozanoCenter for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Alexandra HanlonCenter for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Carlos VargasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
John H MaduroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Julie BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Birgitte OffersenDept of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Dept Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Bruce HafftyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Mark PankuchDepartment of Medical Physics, Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, IL, USA.
Richard AmosDepartment of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Nalee KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shannon M MacDonaldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Youlia KirovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Robert W MutterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: The indications, techniques, and extent to which proton beam therapy (PBT) is employed for breast cancer are unknown. We seek to determine PBT utilization for breast cancer. Materials/methods: The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) Breast Subcommittee developed an IRB-approved 29-question survey and sent it to breast cancer radiation oncologists at all active PBT centers worldwide in June 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses, and comparisons by continent were performed using Fisher's exact tests. Results: Of 79 surveys distributed, 28 recipients submitted responses (35 % response rate) representing fifteen U.S., 8 European, and 5 Asian centers (continent response rate 50 %, 38 %, and 18 %, respectively). Overall, 93 % reported treating breast cancer patients with PBT; 13 (50 %) have treated ≥100 breast cancer patients at their center since opening. Most (89 %) have pencil beam scanning technology. Nearly half (46 %) use moderate hypofractionation (15-20 fractions) for regional nodal irradiation and 42 % conventional fractionation (25-30 fractions). More European centers prefer hypofractionation (88 %) vs. Asian (50 %) and U.S. (21 %) centers (p = 0.003). Common patient selection methods were practitioner determination/patient preference (n = 16) and comparative plan evaluation (n = 15). U.S. centers reported the most experience with breast PBT, with 71 % having treated ≥100 breast cancer patients vs. 38 % in Europe and none in Asia (p = 0.001). Of respondent centers, 39 % enrolled ≥75 % of breast PBT patients on a research study. Conclusion: Utilization, patient selection methods, and dose-fractionation approaches for breast cancer PBT vary worldwide. These survey data serve as a benchmark from which successor surveys can provide insight on practice pattern evolution.

Indexed as

Breast cancerHypofractionationParticle therapyPatterns of careProton therapy

Identifiers

PMID39280125
PMCPMC11399555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.