Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39280026›Full record

ArticleBehavioural neurology2024

Identification of Potential Clusters of Signs and Symptoms to Prioritize Patients' Eligibility for AADCd Screening by 3-OMD Testing: An Italian Delphi Consensus.

Carlotta Spagnoli, Roberta Battini, Filippo Manti, Duccio Maria Cordelli, Andrea Pession, Melissa Bellini, Andrea Bordugo, Gaetano Cantalupo, Antonella Riva, Pasquale Striano and 3 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carlotta SpagnoliChild Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-4035
Roberta BattiniDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-1355
Filippo MantiChild Neuropsychiatric Unit, Human Neuroscience Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-8410
Duccio Maria CordelliIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOC Neuropsichiatria dell'Età Pediatrica, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-6419
Andrea PessionDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-9562
Melissa BelliniPediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, AUSL di Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8399-139X
Andrea BordugoInherited Metabolic Diseases Unit and Regional Centre for Newborn Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment of Inherited Metabolic Diseases and Congenital Endocrine Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-8187
Gaetano CantalupoInnovation Biomedicine Section, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1343-8434
Antonella RivaPediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-5571
Pasquale StrianoPediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-1476
Marco SpadaDepartment of Pediatrics, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8894-350X
Francesco PortaDepartment of Pediatrics, Metabolic Diseases, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-4867
Carlo FuscoChild Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9321-0952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: AADCd is an ultrarare, underdiagnosed neurometabolic disorder for which a screening test (3-OMD dosing on dried blood spot (DBS)) and targeted gene therapy (authorized in the EU and the UK) are available. Therefore, it is mandatory to raise awareness of presenting symptoms and signs among practitioners. Delivering scientifically sound information to promote screening of patients with the correct cluster of symptoms and signs would be critical. Materials and Methods: In light of the lack of sound evidence on this issue, expert opinion level of evidence was elicited with the Delphi method. Fourteen steering committee members invited a panel of 29 Italian experts to express their opinions on a series of crucial but controversial topics related to using 3-OMD DBS as a screening method in AADCd. Clusters of symptoms and signs were divided into typical or atypical, depending on age groups. Inclusion in newborn screening programs and the usefulness of a clinical score were investigated. A five-point Likert scale was used to rate the level of priority attributed to each statement. Results: The following statements reached the highest priority: testing pediatric patients with hypotonia, developmental delay, movement disorders, and oculogyric crises; inclusion of 3-OMD dosing on DBS in neonatal screening programs; development of a clinical score to support patients' selection for 3-OMD screening; among atypical phenotypes based on clinical characteristics of Italian patients: testing patients with intellectual disability and parkinsonism-dystonia.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueNeonatal ScreeningAdultChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornItalyMale

Identifiers

PMID39280026
PMCPMC11401676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.