ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Identification of immune-related endoplasmic reticulum stress genes in proliferative diabetic retinopathy using bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative analysis of PANoptosis-related genes in diabetic retinopathy: machine learning identification and experimental validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a severe complication of diabetes, and understanding its molecular mechanisms is crucial. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has been implicated in various diseases, including diabetic complications. This study aims to elucidate ER stress-related biomarkers in PDR, providing insights into the underlying molecular pathways. Methods: We analyzed two independent PDR datasets, GSE102485 and GSE60436. The GSE102485 dataset (22 PDR and 3 normal samples) was the primary dataset for comprehensive analyses, including differential expression, functional enrichment, PPI network construction, immune cell infiltration, and drug prediction. The GSE60436 dataset (6 PDR and 3 normal samples) was used for validation. Results: Differential expression analysis identified 2451 genes, including 328 ER stress-related genes. Functional analysis revealed enrichment in ER stress-related processes and pathways. Hub genes (BCL2, CCL2, IL-1β, TLR4, TNF, TP53) were identified, and immune infiltration analysis showed altered immune cell proportions. Validation in GSE60436 and Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive molecular characterization of ER stress in PDR, highlighting altered biological processes, immune changes, and potential therapeutic targets. The identified hub genes and small molecules offer avenues for further investigation and therapy development, enhancing understanding of PDR pathogenesis and aiding targeted intervention creation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.