Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279987›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Identification and Verification of an Alternative Polyadenylation-Related lncRNA Prognostic Signature for Glioma.

Hui Wang, ZhiJun Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hui WangDepartment of Pathology, The First People's Hospital of Fuyang, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province 31400, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-0649
ZhiJun JiangDepartment of Pathology, The First People's Hospital of Fuyang, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province 31400, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-4047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the high mortality and modality of glioma, it was urgently needed to develop a glioma prognostic assessment system. Previous studies demonstrated that alternative polyadenylation- (APA-) related genes are important in immune response and oncogenesis. mRNA and lncRNA expression information of glioma samples were acquired from CGGA and TCGA databases, and lncRNAs associated with APA were selected through correlation analysis. The prognosis model of APA-related lncRNAs was built by the univariate Cox, random forest, and univariate Cox regression analyses. Glioma samples were assigned into high- and low-risk groups. Independence and effectiveness of the prognostic model were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, ROC curve, and Cox regression analyses. GO, KEGG enrichment, and GSEA analyses showed that the mainly involved signaling pathways were enriched in cellular immunity and immune signal transduction. We further analyzed expression differences of negative immune regulatory genes and immune cell infiltration degree between two groups. Immune checkpoints CTLA4 and LAG3 and immune suppressors TGFB, IL10, NOS3, and IDO1 and immune cell infiltration were notably upregulated in the high-risk group. The PD1/PDL1 expression was significantly correlated with risk score, showing that the prognostic model of APA-related lncRNA could effectively assess the tumor immune suppression. In conclusion, we established a risk assessment model of APA-related lncRNA in glioma, which could effectively evaluate prognosis of patients with glioma and tumor immune suppression and could provide guidance for clinical treatment.

Identifiers

PMID39279987
PMCPMC11401696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.