ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Liquid-liquid phase separation-related features of
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer (PC) has been found to be closely associated with liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). This study sought to identify LLPS-related biomarkers in PC to construct a robust prognostic model. Methods: Transcriptomic data and clinical information related to PC were retrieved from publicly accessible databases. The PC-related data set was subjected to differential expression, Mendelian randomization (MR), univariate Cox, and least absolute selection and shrinkage operator analyses to identify biomarkers. Using the biomarkers, we subsequently constructed a risk model, identified the independent prognostic factors of PC, established a nomogram, and conducted an immune analysis. Results: The study identified four genes linked with an increased risk of PC; that is, Conclusions: Six genes were identified as having potential causal relationships with PC. These genes were integrated into a prognostic risk model, thereby serving as unique prognostic signatures. Our findings provide novel insights into predicting the prognosis of PC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.