ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Developing a prognostic signature: identifying differentially expressed genes in cardia and non-cardia gastric cancer for immunity and therapeutic sensitivity analysis.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulation of RNA methylation linked to drug resistance in gastric cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) can be anatomically categorized into two subtypes; that is, cardia gastric cancer (CGC) and non-cardia gastric cancer (NCGC), which have distinct molecular mechanisms and prognoses. At present, the majority of pharmacological interventions for GC adhere to non-specific treatment regimens. The stratification of GC based on molecular disparities between CGC and NCGC has important clinical guidance value and could help in the development of precision therapies tailored to individual patient needs. Nevertheless, research in this specialized field remains notably limited. This study aims to investigate the molecular differences between CGC and NCGC and to leverage these differences to develop a prognostic risk scoring model (PRSM). Methods: We used patient data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and performed a differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis between CGC and NCGC. A PRSM was developed from the prognosis-associated DEGs identified through Cox regression analyses and was well validated using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data. Results: A total of 339 DEGs were identified between CGC and NCGC, and four prognosis-associated genes were used to construct the PRSM. Using the risk coefficients and expression levels of signature genes, a median risk score (RS) was calculated to classify patients into high- and low-risk groups. The high-risk group had a significantly worse prognosis than the low-risk group. An in-depth analysis revealed that Conclusions: This study elucidated the unique molecular characteristics of GC subtypes based on the anatomical site and provided a preliminary contribution for the development of precision medicine for GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.