The impact of transanal drainage tube on the incidence of anastomotic leakage and small bowel obstruction in radical surgery (Dixon) for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) and small bowel obstruction (SBO) are common complications after rectal cancer radical surgery (Dixon). Although the commonly used defunctioning stoma (DS) can reduce the incidence and harm of AL, it increases the probability of other adverse consequences, including SBO. Therefore, a safe and effective method for preventing the complications related to the radical surgery of rectal cancer is urgently needed. Previous studies have found that transanal drainage tube (TDT) can have a positive impact on the incidence of these two complications by draining gas and feces from the intestinal lumen, without causing other serious consequences. Therefore, this article further explores the clinical benefits that TDT can bring by analyzing the clinical data of postoperative patients with rectal cancer. Methods: This study included 221 patients who underwent radical surgery (Dixon) for rectal cancer in Hubei Cancer Hospital from September 2020 to February 2023, determine whether it meets the inclusion criteria of this study based on preoperative examination, intraoperative exploration results, and treatment methods. DS was used in 70 patients and TDT in 88 patients during the surgery; meanwhile, no protective anastomotic measures were applied in 63 patients. Seventy patients subjected to DS were categorized as group 1, 88 patients subjected to TDT as group 2, and 63 patients with no protective measures for anastomosis as group 3. Through postoperative clinical manifestations, imaging examinations, and laboratory tests, a total of 18 cases of AL and 30 cases of SBO were identified in the three groups. The effectiveness of TDT and that of other surgical procedures in preventing complications, accelerating postoperative recovery, and reducing surgical costs were compared through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The clinical features of the three groups have baseline comparability. No statistically difference was noted in baseline characteristics between three groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of AL and SBO in group 1 are 7.1% and 27.1%, in group 2 are 3.4% and 4.5%, and in group 3 are 15.9% and 11.1%. Compared to patients in no protective anastomotic measures with TDT and DS, TDT has a lower incidence of postoperative AL (P<0.05) and SBO (P>0.05), and faster postoperative recovery (P<0.05). The cost of inpatient surgery is not significantly different (P>0.05). Although DS can reduce the incidence of AL to a certain extent (P>0.05), it significantly increased the incidence of SBO (P<0.05), delayed postoperative defecation time (P<0.05) and caused higher cost (P<0.001). Compared to DS, the incidence of AL in TDT is not significantly different (P>0.05), but the incidence of SBO is noticeably lower (P<0.001), with faster postoperative recovery and less cost (P<0.05). Conclusions: TDT is a safer, more effective, and more economical surgery for preventing postoperative complications.