ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
The clinical outcomes of patients with vascular invasion after deceased donor liver transplantation.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: from patient selection and downstaging to risk stratification and post-transplant surveillance.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vascular invasion is a major risk factor for poor prognosis of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of deceased donor LT (DDLT) for the treatment of microvascular invasion (MVI) and segmental portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 141 patients who received DDLT for HCC combined with vascular invasion from January 2016 to December 2023 at Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital. To assess the risk of vascular invasion associated with the LT prognosis, we evaluated various clinicopathologic variables. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) based on different types of vascular invasion were also analyzed. Results: A total of 141 patients were enrolled in this study, including patients with MVI (MVI group, n=60), segmental PVTT with segmental branches of the portal vein or above (segmental PVTT group, n=13), and lobar PVTT involving the left and right branches of the portal vein or the main portal vein (lobar PVTT group, n=68). Between the tumor recurrence group and the no recurrence group, there were significant differences in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, tumor total diameter, pretransplant treatment, histological grade, and types of vascular invasion. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the types of vascular invasion, the lobar PVTT group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (lobar Conclusions: Lobar PVTT remains a contraindication to LT, whereas segmental PVTT can still be considered for LT after careful screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.