ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Retrospective analysis of lithium treatment: examination of blood levels.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lithium Point-of-Care Testing to Improve Adherence to Monitoring Guidelines and Quality of Maintenance Therapy: Protocol for a Randomised Feasibility Trial.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing drug-drug interactions research: integrating AI-powered prediction, vulnerable populations, and regulatory insights.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lithium is a key medication for treating various neuropsychiatric disorders, with a narrow therapeutic index and significant drug interactions. Monitoring lithium blood levels is crucial. This study aims to investigate the relationship between lithium blood levels and demographic characteristics such as age and gender, as well as possible drug interactions, in patients with a history of lithium use who applied to various services and outpatient clinics. Materials & methods: The files of 438 patients who were admitted to various services and outpatient clinics of Kırklareli Training and Research Hospital between January 1 and December 31, 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' blood lithium levels, gender, age, service/outpatient clinic they admitted to, other medications used, urea, creatinine, and eGFR values were recorded. Results: When the demographic characteristics of 438 patients were examined, 62% were female (270), 38% were male (168), and the average age was 46.3 ± 14.8 years, showing a normal distribution. It was found that 192 patients (71 males, 121 females) had therapeutic lithium blood levels, while 244 patients (97 males, 147 females) had levels below 0.6 mmol/L. Two female patients had blood levels above the therapeutic range (1.23 and 1.43 mmol/L). Among the clinics and services, the four most frequented were the psychiatry clinic (314 patients), internal medicine clinic (36 patients), emergency service (27 patients), and medical oncology clinic (17 patients). Of the 314 patients admitted to the psychiatry clinic, 168 had therapeutic drug levels; only 7 of the 36 admitted to internal medicine had therapeutic levels; 12 of the 27 patients in the emergency service had therapeutic levels; and all 17 patients in medical oncology had levels below therapeutic limits. Discussion: The data emphasize the importance of regular blood level monitoring to ensure lithium treatment's efficacy and patient safety. It is noteworthy that most patients in the psychiatry clinic had therapeutic drug levels, while those in other clinics had lower levels. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of regular blood level monitoring to ensure the efficacy and safety of lithium treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.