Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279766›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2024

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with 1-4 brain metastases: A single-arm phase 2 trial outcome analysis (NCT03398694).

Namita Agrawal, Jack M Shireman, Kevin Shiue, Aaron Kamer, LaKeisha Boyd, Yong Zang, Neel Mukherjee, James Miller, Charles Kulwin, Aaron Cohen-Gadol and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03398694 (A Phase II Study Analyzing Pre-operative Stereotactic Radiosurgery Followed by Resection for Patients With 1 - 4 Brain Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03398694 nacompletednot on this map

A Phase II Study Analyzing Pre-operative Stereotactic Radiosurgery Followed by Resection for Patients With 1 - 4 Brain Metastases

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2018 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmsRadiosurgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Namita AgrawalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Jack M ShiremanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-7805
Kevin ShiueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Aaron KamerDepartment of Clinical Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
LaKeisha BoydDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Yong ZangDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-4756
Neel MukherjeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
James MillerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Charles KulwinGoodman Campbell Brain and Spine Neurological Surgery, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Aaron Cohen-GadolDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Troy PaynerGoodman Campbell Brain and Spine Neurological Surgery, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Chih-Ta LinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Jesse J SavageDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Brandon LaneDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Bradley BohnstedtDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Tim LautenschlaegerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Naoyuki SaitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Mitesh ShahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Gordon WatsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
Mahua DeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7024-5164

Funding

Neuroscience Training ProgramT32NS105602 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Ari Rosenberg · 2019 to 2026
$2.5M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS105602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) following surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic oligo brain metastasis (BM), however, it is associated with 10-15% local failure. Targeting a resection cavity is imprecise, thus preoperative radiosurgery where the target is well-defined may be superior, however, the efficacy of preoperative SRS has not yet been tested in a clinical trial. Methods: We conducted a phase 2, single-arm trial of preoperative SRS followed by surgical resection in patients with 1-4 symptomatic oligo BMs (NCT03398694) with the primary objective of measuring 6-month local control (LC). SRS was delivered to all patients utilizing a gamma knife or linear accelerator as per RTOG-9005 dosing criteria [Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L, et al. Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. Results: The trial screened 50 patients, 48 patients were treated under the protocol and 32 patients completed the entire follow-up period. Of all the patients who completed the follow-up period, the primary endpoint of 6-month LC was 100% (95% CI: 0.891-1.000; Conclusions: Our data confirms superior local control in patients who received preoperative SRS when compared to historical controls. Further study with a larger randomized cohort of patients is warranted to fully understand the benefits of preoperative SRS.

Indexed as

brain metastasesphase II clinical trialstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID39279766
PMCPMC11398945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.