ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2024
Exploring the Activation Process of the Glycine Receptor.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Elucidating the Mechanism of the NADPH-Cytochrome P450 Reductase-Mediated Electron Transfer Cycle: Experimental and Computational Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dynamics and Interplay of the Binding Pockets in the Glycine Receptor.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glycine receptors (GlyR) conduct inhibitory glycinergic neurotransmission in the spinal cord and the brainstem. They play an important role in muscle tone, motor coordination, respiration, and pain perception. However, the mechanism underlying GlyR activation remains unclear. There are five potential glycine binding sites in α1 GlyR, and different binding patterns may cause distinct activation or desensitization behaviors. In this study, we investigated the coupling of protein conformational changes and glycine binding events to elucidate the influence of binding patterns on the activation and desensitization processes of α1 GlyRs. Subsequently, we explored the energetic distinctions between the apical and lateral pathways during α1 GlyR conduction to identify the pivotal factors in the ion conduction pathway preference. Moreover, we predicted the mutational effects of the key residues and verified our predictions using electrophysiological experiments. For the mutants that can be activated by glycine, the predictions of the mutational directions were all correct. The strength of the mutational effects was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, yielding a value of -0.77 between the calculated highest energy barriers and experimental maximum current amplitudes. These findings contribute to our understanding of GlyR activation, identify the key residues of GlyRs, and provide guidance for mechanistic studies on other pLGICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.