Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279475›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2025

Multianalyte Approach-Including Automated Preparation of Calibrators-for Validated Quantification of 82 Drugs in Whole Blood by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Andrea E Steuer, Maja Keller, Thomas Kraemer, Sandra N Poetzsch

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic toxicology, 2023-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea E SteuerDepartment of Forensic Pharmacology & Toxicology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8983-2353
Maja KellerDepartment of Forensic Pharmacology & Toxicology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas KraemerDepartment of Forensic Pharmacology & Toxicology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-606X
Sandra N PoetzschDepartment of Forensic Pharmacology & Toxicology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioanalysis, such as the quantification of drugs in different matrices, is of great importance in forensic toxicology. Nowadays, mainly so-called multianalyte approaches are used given their increased speed and effectiveness. However, such multianalyte procedures can be difficult to develop and maintain with sufficient robustness in the laboratory. One aspect of this is the tedious, manual preparation of spiking solutions containing such a great number of analytes. Therefore, the current study aimed to develop and validate a fast, simple, and robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of 82 classic drugs and to evaluate an alternative autosampler-assisted automated approach for the preparation of spiking solutions. Simple protein precipitation of 200-μL whole blood was used followed by analysis by reversed-phase LC-MS/MS in advanced scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method was fully validated according to international guidelines, including selectivity, recovery, matrix effects, linearity, bias/imprecision, processed-sample stability, and limits. Validation criteria were fulfilled for all analytes except for buprenorphine and five benzodiazepines. In the context of a multianalyte procedure, a (multipurpose) autosampler-assisted automatic preparation of calibrator spiking solutions proved comparable to manual preparation. Thus, automated preparation can overcome the frequently performed manual, time-consuming, and error-prone steps of multianalyte approaches and still allow for customized calibration ranges. Since its introduction, more than 8000 cases have been measured with the presented method, and 35 proficiency tests have been passed.

Indexed as

Substance Abuse DetectionTandem Mass SpectrometryAutomationCalibrationChromatography, LiquidForensic ToxicologyHumansLimit of DetectionPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparationsautomated spiking solution preparationdrugs (of abuse)LC–MS/MSmultianalyte

Identifiers

PMID39279475
PMCPMC12209705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.