Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279216›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of botany2025

Modulation of plant transcription factors and priming of stress tolerance by plant growth-promoting bacteria: a systematic review.

Abdussabur M Kaleh, Pooja Singh, Kah Ooi Chua, Jennifer Ann Harikrishna

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Proline Dehydrogenase GeneJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Expression of Small Secreted Peptide Genes in Abiotic Stress in Plants Interacting with Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in the Control of Plant Fungal Pathogens.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. A century ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdussabur M KalehCentre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Pooja SinghSchool of Science, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Kah Ooi ChuaCentre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Jennifer Ann HarikrishnaCentre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.

Funding

Ministry of Finance PPSI-2020-HICOE-06Ministry of Higher Education FP066-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) have been shown to improve plant growth and stress tolerance through mechanisms including improved access to nutrients and biotic competition with pathogens. As such, the use of PGPB can help to address challenges to crop productivity, but information on interactions between PGPB and their plant hosts, especially at the level of gene regulation, is distributed across diverse studies involving several different plants and PGPB. SCOPE: For this review, we analysed recent research publications reporting specifically on plant transcription factor (TF) expression in association with PGPB, to determine if there are any common findings and to identify gaps that offer opportunities for focused future research.

conclusionsThe inoculation of plants with PGPB elicits a dynamic and temporal response. Initially, there is an upregulation of defence-responsive TFs, followed by their downregulation in an intermediate phase, and finally, another upregulation, providing longer term stress tolerance. PGPB priming activates plant defences in the form of induced systemic resistance (ISR), often via the MAMP/MAPK pathways and involving one or more of the major plant hormone-signalling pathways and their crosstalk. Following PGPB priming, the TF families most commonly reported as expressed across different plants and for different pathogens are ERF and WRKY, while the TFs most commonly expressed across different plants for different abiotic stresses are ERF and DREB. There were inconsistencies between studies regarding the timing of the shift from the initial phase to the intermediate phase, and some of the TFs expressed during this process have not been fully characterized. This calls for more research to investigate the regulatory functions and phases of TF expression, to enhance crop resilience. Most reports on abiotic stresses have focused on salinity and drought, with fewer studies addressing nutrient deficiency, heavy metals, flooding and other stresses, highlighting the need for further research in these areas.

Indexed as

BacteriaPlant DevelopmentPlant ProteinsPlantsStress, PhysiologicalTranscription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsAbioticbioticDREBERFISRMYBPGPBprimingstress tolerancetranscription factorsWRKY

Identifiers

PMID39279216
PMCPMC11897433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.