Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279135›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of community psychology2024

Applying a community-engaged participatory machine learning model.

Emmanuella Ngozi Asabor, Kammarauche Aneni, Sitara Weerakoon, Ijeoma Opara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of community psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-Augmented Prevention Science Needs Community-Engaged Prevention Science: a Framework for Greater Accountability.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuella Ngozi AsaborYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kammarauche AneniChild Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Sitara WeerakoonDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Ijeoma OparaDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-4699

Funding

Integrating Community Based Participatory Research and Machine Learning Methods to Predict Youth Substance Use Disorders for Urban Cities in New JerseyDP1DA058982 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OPARA, IJEOMA · 2023 to 2024
$2.3M
Understanding the Role of Neighborhoods on Urban Youth's Substance Use and Mental Health: A Community-Based Substance Abuse Prevention ProjectDP5OD029636 · OD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OPARA, IJEOMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA058982NIDA NIH HHS L60 DA054692NIH HHS DP5 OD029636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although predictive algorithms have been described as the definitive solution to bias in health care, machine learning techniques may also propagate existing health inequities within the community context. However, there may be ways in which machine learning techniques can help community psychologists, public health researchers and practitioners identify patterns in data in a way that empowers improved outcomes. Incorporating community insight in all stages of machine learning research mitigates bias by positioning members of underrepresented communities as the experts of their lived experiences. As community psychologists already prioritize community-based participatory practices, we propose three core guiding principles for a community-engaged participatory model for research using machine learning techniques: shared decision-making, reflexivity and structural humility, and flexibility and adaptability. Guided by these three principles, we emphasize grounding priority setting, problem formation, model assumptions, and interpretation of the resulting algorithmic patterns in the truths born from the lived experiences of people closest to the problem. We also suggest opportunities for bidirectional and mutually empowering partnerships between algorithmic scientists and the communities to which their algorithms will be applied. Inclusion of community stakeholders in all stages of machine learning for health research provides an opportunity to develop algorithms that are both highly effective and ethically grounded in the lived experiences of target populations.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchMachine LearningAlgorithmsDecision MakingHumansbiased algorithmsbias in health carecommunity‐based participatory researchmachine learningracism

Identifiers

PMID39279135
PMCPMC12901535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.