Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279130›Full record

Trial reportJournal of advanced nursing2025

Data-Driven Implementation Strategy to Optimise Clinician Behaviour Change at Scale in Complex Clinical Environments: A Multicentre Emergency Care Study.

Kate Curtis, Belinda Kennedy, Julie Considine, Margaret Murphy, Sarah Kourouche, Mary K Lam, Ramon Z Shaban, Christina Aggar, James A Hughes, Margaret Fry

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kate CurtisFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3746-0348
Belinda KennedyFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Julie ConsidineSchool of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3801-2456
Margaret MurphyWestern Sydney Local Health District, North Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah KouroucheFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-6191
Mary K LamSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ramon Z ShabanFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Christina AggarNorthern NSW Local Health District, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
James A HughesSchool of Nursing, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.
Margaret FryFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2005403Thyne Reid Foundation G208356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop an evidence-driven, behaviour change focused strategy to maximise implementation and uptake of HIRAID (History including Infection risk, Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication and reassessment) in 30 Australian rural, regional and metropolitan emergency departments.

designAn embedded, mixed-methods study.

methodsThis study is the first phase of a step-wedge cluster randomised control trial of HIRAID involving over 1300 emergency nurses. Concurrent quantitative and qualitative data were collected via an electronic survey sent to all nurses to identify preliminary barriers and enablers to HIRAID implementation. The survey was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, which is a synthesis of behavioural change theories that applies the science of intervention implementation in health care to effect change. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data with inductive content analysis. Data were then integrated to generate barriers and enablers to HIRAID implementation which were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Corresponding intervention functions and Behaviour Change techniques were selected and an overarching implementation strategy was developed through stakeholder consultation and application of the APEASE criteria (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety and Equity).

resultsSix barriers to HIRAID implementation were identified by 670 respondents (response rate ~58%) representing all 30 sites: (i) lack of knowledge about HIRAID; (ii) high workload, (iii) lack of belief anything would change; (iv) not suitable for workplace; (v), uncertainty about what to do and (vi) lack of support or time for education. The three enablers were as follows: (i) willingness to learn and adopt something new; (ii) recognition of the need for something new and (iii) wanting to do what is best for patient care. The 10 corresponding domains were mapped to seven intervention functions, 21 behaviour change techniques and 45 mechanisms. The major components of the implementation strategy were a scaffolded education programme, clinical support and environmental modifications.

conclusionsA systematic process guided by the behaviour change wheel resulted in the generation of a multifaceted implementation strategy to implement HIRAID across rural, regional and metropolitan emergency departments. Implementation fidelity, reach and impact now require evaluation. IMPACT: HIRAID emergency nursing assessment framework reduced clinical deterioration relating to emergency care and improved self-confidence and documentation in emergency departments in pilot studies. Successful implementation of any intervention in the emergency department is notoriously difficult due to workload unpredictability, the undifferentiated nature of patients and high staff turnover. Key barriers and enablers were identified, and a successful implementation strategy was developed. This study uses theoretical frameworks to identify barriers and enablers to develop a data-driven, behavioural-focused implementation strategy to optimise the uptake of HIRAID in geographically diverse emergency departments which can be used to inform future implementation efforts involving emergency nurses. REPORTING

methodThe CROSS reporting method (Supporting Information S3) was used to adhere to EQUATOR guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand; Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) number: ACTRN12621001456842, registered 25/10/2021.

Indexed as

Emergency NursingEmergency Service, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedanalgesiaclinical deteriorationemergency nursingemergency servicehospitalmixed‐methodsnursing assessmentpatient assessmentpatient outcome assessmentrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39279130
PMCPMC11967304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.