Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279124›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective.

Lilla Lovász, Carolin Sommer-Trembo, Julia M I Barth, John D Scasta, Ralitsa Grancharova-Hill, Rhys T Lemoine, Viola Kerekes, Léa Merckling, Amos Bouskila, Jens-Christian Svenning and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lilla LovászZoological Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, Basel, 4051, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0997-3717
Carolin Sommer-TremboDepartment of Paleontology, University of Zurich, Karl-Schmid-Strasse 4, Zurich, 8006, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9952-2906
Julia M I BarthZoological Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, Basel, 4051, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5125-819X
John D ScastaDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, Wyoming, 82071, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9925-7492
Ralitsa Grancharova-HillHolistic centre "Zoo Metta", 39 Petar Bogdan Street, Sofia, 1050, Bulgaria.
Rhys T LemoineCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 116, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0377-0065
Viola KerekesHortobágy National Park Directorate, Sumen u. 2, Debrecen, 4024, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0008-4254-5080
Léa MercklingRéserve Naturelle Petite Camargue Alsacienne, 1 Rue de la Pisciculture, Saint-Louis, 68300, France.
Amos BouskilaDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Ben-Gurion Blvd 1, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6995-5070
Jens-Christian SvenningCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 116, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3415-0862
Antoine FagesZoological Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, Basel, 4051, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6985-4360

Funding

Danish National Research Foundation DNRF173Independent Research Fund Denmark 0135-00225BVillum Fonden 16549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, the integration of horses (Equus ferus) in European rewilding initiatives has gained widespread popularity due to their potential for regulating vegetation and restoring natural ecosystems. However, employing horses in conservation efforts presents important challenges, which we here explore and discuss. These challenges encompass the lack of consensus on key terms inherent to conservation and rewilding, the entrenched culture and strong emotions associated with horses, low genetic diversity and high susceptibility to hereditary diseases in animals under human selection, as well as insufficient consideration for the social behaviour of horses in wild-living populations. In addition, management of wild-living horses involves intricate welfare, ethics and legislative dimensions. Anthropocentric population-control initiatives may be detrimental to horse group structures since they tend to prioritise individual welfare over the health of populations and ecosystems. To overcome these challenges, we provide comprehensive recommendations. These involve a systematic acquisition of genetic information, a focus on genetic diversity rather than breed purity and minimal veterinary intervention in wild-living populations. Further, we advise allowing for natural top-down and bottom-up control - or, if impossible, simulating this by culling or non-lethal removal of horses - instead of using fertility control for population management. We advocate for intensified collaboration between conservation biologists and practitioners and enhanced communication with the general public. Decision-making should be informed by a thorough understanding of the genetic makeup, common health issues and dynamics, and social behaviour in wild-living horse populations. Such a holistic approach is essential to reconcile human emotions associated with horses with the implementation of conservation practices that are not only effective but also sustainable for the long-term viability of functional, biodiverse ecosystems, while rehabilitating the horse as a widespread wild-living species in Europe.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsAnimal WelfareEcosystemEuropeHorsesconservation genomicsecosystemequinesinbreedingrewildingsocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID39279124
PMCPMC11718625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.