Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39278980›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2024

Clinical impact of concomitant BIO-three use in advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor.

Hitomi Nakatsukasa, Masaya Takahashi, Masahito Shibano, Yusuke Ishigami, Tomoya Kawaguchi, Yasutaka Nakamura, Hiroyasu Kaneda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hitomi NakatsukasaDepartment of Pharmacy, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masaya TakahashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masahito ShibanoDepartment of Pharmacy, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke IshigamiDepartment of Pharmacy, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoya KawaguchiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Yasutaka NakamuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyasu KanedaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. kaneda.hiroyasu@omu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7696-2391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The probiotic MIYAIRI 588 can potentially improve the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI. However, the impact of other probiotics on ICI-treatment efficacy remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to clarify the association between BIO-three use and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who had received ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy. Concomitant therapy with probiotic bacteria was defined as receiving it within 180 days before ICI therapy.

resultsHere, 289 patients were enrolled, including 23 (8.0%) receiving BIO-three. In the multivariable analysis, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients receiving BIO-three tended to be longer than those of patients not receiving probiotic therapy (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.30; p = 0.33; OS, HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.37-1.28; p = 0.24). After propensity score matching with weighted adjustment, patients receiving BIO-three tended to have prolonged PFS (median PFS [range] 7.6 months [2.6-17.4] vs 3.2 months [1.6-7.0]; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.25-1.12; p = 0.09) and OS (median OS [range] 25.6 months [10.8-not reached] vs 10.9 months [7.3-not reached]; HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.24-1.36; p = 0.20) than those not receiving probiotic therapy.

conclusionThis study suggests the prognostic impact of concomitant BIO-three use in patients with advanced NSCLC on ICI treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsProbioticsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBIO-threeGut microbiotaImmune checkpoint inhibitorLung cancerProbiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.