ArticleScientific reports2024
Intracranial bypass for giant aneurysms treatment assessed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Twins as the Implementation Layer of Precision Medicine in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Review
- Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Patterns Predict the Shrinkage of Aneurysms in Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Largest documented cerebral aneurysm mimicking a giant brain tumor and treated by highly selective occlusion of inflow: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unruptured giant intracranial aneurysms (GIA) are those with diameters of 25 mm or greater. As aneurysm size is correlated with rupture risk, GIA natural history is poor. Parent artery occlusion or trapping plus bypass revascularization should be considered to encourage intra-aneurysmal thrombosis when other treatment options are contraindicated. The mechanistic background of these methods is poorly studied. Thus, we assessed the potential of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analyses for clinical use in the preoperative stage. A CFD investigation in three patient-specific flexible models of whole arterial brain circulation was performed. A C6 ICA segment GIA model was created based on CT angiography. Two models were then constructed that simulated a virtual bypass in combination with proximal GIA occlusion, but with differing middle cerebral artery (MCA) recipient vessels for the anastomosis. FSI and CFD investigations were performed in three models to assess changes in flow pattern and haemodynamic parameters alternations (wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), maximal time averaged WSS (TAWSS), and pressure). General flow splitting across the entire domain was affected by virtual bypass procedures, and any deficiency was partially compensated by a specific configuration of the circle of Willis. Following the implementation of bypass procedures, a reduction in haemodynamic parameters was observed within the aneurysm in both cases under analysis. In the case of the temporal MCA branch bypass, the decreases in the studied parameters were slightly greater than in the frontal MCA branch bypass. The reduction in the magnitude of the chosen area-averaged parameters (averaged over the aneurysm wall surface) was as follows: WSS 35.7%, OSI 19.0%, TAWSS 94.7%, and pressure 24.2%. FSI CFD investigation based on patient-specific anatomy models with subsequent stimulation of virtual proximal aneurysm occlusion in conjunction with bypass showed that this method creates a pro-thrombotic favourable environment whilst reducing intra-aneurysmal pressure leading to shrinking. MCA branch recipient selection for optimum haemodynamic conditions should be evaluated individually in the preoperative stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.