Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39278940›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Risk assessment and soil heavy metal contamination near marble processing plants (MPPs) in district Malakand, Pakistan.

Asghar Khan, Muhammad Saleem Khan, Fazal Hadi, Qaisar Khan, Kishwar Ali, Ghulam Saddiq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asghar KhanDepartment of Botany, Islamia College, Peshawar, Pakistan. asgharmkd35@gmail.com.
Muhammad Saleem KhanDepartment of Botany, Islamia College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Fazal HadiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Pakistan.
Qaisar KhanMaterial Chemistry Laboratory, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Pakistan.
Kishwar AliCollege of General Education, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Arab League Street, P.O. Box 24449, Doha, Qatar.
Ghulam SaddiqDepartment of Physics, Islamia College, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil heavy metals (HMs) pollution is a growing global concern, mainly in regions with rapid industrial growth. This study assessed the concentrations, potential sources, and health risks of HMs in agricultural soils near marble processing plants in Malakand, Pakistan. A total of 21 soil samples were analyzed for essential and toxic HMs via inductively coupled plasma‒optical emission spectrometry (ICP‒OES), and probabilistic health risks were evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation. The concentrations (mg/kg) of Ca (29,250), P (805.5) and Cd (4.5) exceeded the average shale limits of 22,100, 700, and 3.0 mg/kg, respectively, and indices such as Nemerow's synthetic contamination index (NSCI) and the geoaccumulation index (I

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsChildEnvironmental MonitoringHumansPakistanRisk AssessmentSoilMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsCompositional data analysis (CoDa)Health risk assessmentMarble processing plants (MPPs)Monte Carlo simulationSoil heavy metal pollution

Identifiers

PMID39278940
PMCPMC11403003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.