ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Differential prognostic value of residual nodal burden in breast cancer subtypes.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nomogram to predict disease-free survival in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on clinicopathological and sonographic features.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Predictors of Nodal Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeResidual cancer burden (RCB) index after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is highly prognostic in patients with breast cancer (BC) but does not account for subtype or the precise impact of residual nodal burden (RNB). We aimed to precisely define the effect of RNB on survival by subtypes.
methodsAdult women with non-metastatic BC diagnosed from 2006 to 2021 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who received NAC followed by surgery within 8 months were included. RNB was also evaluated as a predictor of mortality with multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to compare overall survival.
results51,917 patients were included. After adjustment, ypN stage was the strongest predictor of mortality, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.24 (95% CI 2.08-2.41) for ypN1 vs ypN0 and increased with increasing nodal burden-ypN2 vs ypN0 OR 5.03, 95% CI 4.60-5.51 and ypN3 vs ypN0 OR 8.85, 95% CI 7.88-9.93. Stratification of survival curves with higher RNB is most pronounced for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with an absolute difference of 64% in 5-year overall survival between ypN0 and ypN3 patients, and lowest for the ER+/HER2- subtype with a 25% absolute difference in 5-year OS between ypN0 and ypN3 patients. On interaction analysis, ypN status was a stronger predictor of mortality for the TNBC subtype compared to other subtypes.
conclusionRNB has a significantly different impact on survival by BC subtypes. Future study of optimal therapeutic strategies for patients with residual nodal disease after NAC should account for subtype-specific differences in prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.