Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39278650›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Intrapartum ultrasound for cervical dilatation: Inter- and intra-observer agreement.

Arwa Hanidu, Mariya Kovalenko, Sana Usman, Lorenzo Monasta, Giulia Zamagni, Tamara Stampalija, Christoph Lees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arwa HaniduQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0689-3466
Mariya KovalenkoQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sana UsmanQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Lorenzo MonastaClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7774-548X
Giulia ZamagniClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Tamara StampalijaUnit of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-3848
Christoph LeesQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-5561

Funding

Imperial College London
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDigital vaginal examination (DVE) is considered the standard of care for assessing labor progress and cervical dilatation. However, it may be painful and is a subjective method that can increase the risk of chorioamnionitis. Known inter- and intra-observer variability exists in measurements of cervical dilatation obtained digitally. However, little is known about the inter- and intra-observer variability when using intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). Our objectives were to investigate the relationship between cervical dilatation as assessed by TPUS and DVE. To assess inter- and intra-observer variability in both single and repeated ultrasound assessments of cervical dilatation during active labor. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis single-center study was conducted at an inner-city maternity unit in London, UK. Nulliparous participants at term with a live, singleton fetus in cephalic presentation were recruited between May 2021 and November 2022. During active labor, TPUS was performed subsequent to DVE. Repeat ultrasound assessments were performed where feasible. Participants were in a supine position, with flexed hips and knees and with an empty bladder. The ultrasound transducer was placed transversely on the maternal perineum. The anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the cervix was measured, and two-dimensional (2D) cine-loop videos were analyzed to obtain accurate measurements. Data were excluded if the time difference between DVE and TPUS exceeded 60 min.

resultsOf the 206 participants who consented to the study, complete data were obtained from 110 participants, yielding 147 paired TPUS and DVE observations. Ninety-six participants were excluded. The absolute difference between TPUS and DVE assessments was 0 cm in 34% of the observations, 1 cm in 46.3%, and between 2 and 4 cm in 19.7%. The mean difference was -0.9 cm (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85; p < 0.001). Data from 30 participants, with 50 cervical dilatation measurements, were used to assess inter- and intra-observer variability. The mean difference for the first ultrasound assessment was 0.07 cm (95% limit of agreement = -0.96 to 1.10, p < 0.001), for inter-observer variability, and 0.01 cm (95% limit of agreement = -0.29 to 0.30; p < 0.001) for intra-observer variability.

conclusionsAssessment of the cervix with TPUS during active labor is feasible and shows a strong correlation with DVE measurements. The majority of ultrasound measurements yielded readings within 1 cm of the corresponding DVE values, demonstrating high intraclass correlation and good inter- and intra-observer agreement.

Indexed as

Labor Stage, FirstObserver VariationUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultCervix UteriFemaleGynecological ExaminationHumansLondonPregnancycervical dilatationdigital vaginal examinationtransperineal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39278650
PMCPMC11610001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.