ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025
Former Primary Caregivers of Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Evaluate the PATH (Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home) Instrument.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate whether Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home (PATH), a validated instrument assessing gaps in caregiver commitment and capacity to care for a patient with a disabling condition, would be helpful to identify gaps in preparing primary caregivers of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
designA descriptive survey design with quantitative and qualitative data.
methodsFormer primary caregivers of patients with GBM were invited to complete a 17-question online survey during February and March 2023. Former caregivers, each having completed their caregiver journeys, are able to offer a unique perspective across the illness trajectory. Participants reviewed a copy of the PATH instrument and (a) responded to questions rating PATH helpfulness at each stage of the illness trajectory and (b) provided open-ended feedback on the instrument.
resultsOne hundred seventeen of the 124 participants reported the PATH instrument would be helpful across all stages of the illness trajectory. While there were no statistically significant differences across the illness phases, response trends indicated using the PATH instrument earlier in the illness trajectory would have been more helpful to them as caregivers. Qualitative thematic analysis feedback indicated the most significant gap caregivers faced was education on the effects of the illness and treatment.
conclusionIt is vitally important to prepare and support caregivers. A validated instrument can identify unmet needs and inform care decisions. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Patient discharge plans should be guided by the needs and preferences of patients and caregivers. Identifying gaps in education and preparedness early in the illness trajectory may inform the care team of unmet needs, allowing them to tailor resources and support to improve outcomes for patients with GBM and their caregivers. IMPACT: Patient discharge plans should be guided by the needs and preferences of patients and caregivers. Identifying gaps in education and preparedness early in the illness trajectory may inform the care team of unmet needs, allowing them to tailor resources and support to improve outcomes for patients with GBM and their caregivers. PATH has the potential to inform healthcare professionals to develop customised care plans including education, resources and support for caregivers and patients with life-threatening illness. REPORTING
methodStudy adheres to the STROBE reporting method. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Prior to deploying the survey to study participants, in addition to testing by study collaborators (authors), the survey was tested and feedback was received from graduate students and from administrators of the private Facebook group where the survey was promoted to study participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.