ArticleJournal of affective disorders2025
Machine learning with multiple modalities of brain magnetic resonance imaging data to identify the presence of bipolar disorder.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Multimodal Learning in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026Review
- Neural and Behavioral Markers of Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Psychosis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Associations between NIH Toolbox Emotion Battery measures and previous suicide attempt in bipolar I disorder.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic psychiatric mood disorder that is solely diagnosed based on clinical symptoms. These symptoms often overlap with other psychiatric disorders. Efforts to use machine learning (ML) to create predictive models for BD based on data from brain imaging are expanding but have often been limited using only a single modality and the exclusion of the cerebellum, which may be relevant in BD.
methodsIn this study, we sought to improve ML classification of BD by combining information from structural, functional, and diffusion-weighted imaging. Participants (108 BD I, 78 control) with BD type I and matched controls were recruited into an imaging study. This dataset was randomly divided into training and testing sets. For each of the three modalities, a separate ML model was selected, trained, and then used to generate a prediction of the class of each test subject. Majority voting was used to combine results from the three models to make a final prediction of whether a subject had BD. An independent replication sample was used to evaluate the ability of the ML classification to generalize to data collected at other sites.
resultsCombining the three machine learning models through majority voting resulted in an accuracy of 89.5 % for classification of the test subjects as being in the BD or control group. Bootstrapping resulted in a 95 % confidence interval of 78.9 %-97.4 % for test accuracy. Performance was reduced when only using 2 of the 3 modalities. Analysis of feature importance revealed that the cerebellum and nodes of the emotional control network were among the most important regions for classification. The machine learning model performed at chance on the independent replication sample.
conclusionBD I could be identified with high accuracy in our relatively small sample by combining structural, functional, and diffusion-weighted imaging data within a single site but not generalize well to an independent replication sample. Future studies using harmonized imaging protocols may facilitate generalization of ML models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.