ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2024
Epigenetics and the timing of neuronal differentiation.
Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Links Between DNA Methylation and Protein Translation and Their Impacts on Brain Development.Biology · 2026Review
- MeCP2 gene dosage-dependent neurodevelopmentally restricted defects arise by aberrant activation of cell fate-determining bivalent genes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Neuronal hyperactivity becomes mTORC1 independent due to transcriptional changes in tuberous sclerosis complex disease models.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Development of Patient-Derived Neuroprogenitor Cells (hNPCs), Neurons and Astrocytes to Explore the Etiology of Guam Parkinsonism-Dementia Complex (PDC).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Chromatin accessibility provides a window into the genetic etiology of human brain disease.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Potential therapeutic targets for ischemic stroke in pre-clinical studies: Epigenetic-modifying enzymes DNMT/TET and HAT/HDAC.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic regulation of the genome is required for cell-type differentiation during organismal development and is especially important to generate the panoply of specialized cell types that comprise the brain. Here, we review how progressive changes in the chromatin landscape, both in neural progenitors and in postmitotic neurons, orchestrate the timing of gene expression programs that underlie first neurogenesis and then functional neuronal maturation. We discuss how disease-associated mutations in chromatin regulators can change brain composition by impairing the timing of neurogenesis. Further, we highlight studies that are beginning to show how chromatin modifications are integrated at the level of chromatin architecture to coordinate changing transcriptional programs across developmental including in postmitotic neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.