Trial reportUpdates in surgery2025
Therapeutic potential of physical stabilization in VATS pain control: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04735614 (The Effect of Physical Thoracic Stabilization on Pain Control in Patients Who Had a Lung Tumor and Received Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Physical Thoracic Stabilization on Pain Control in Patients Who Had a Lung Tumor and Received Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been widely used for low invasiveness and shorter recovery time. However, patients receiving VATS still experienced moderate-to-severe pain even under both regional and systemic analgesia. Little is known on the effect of non-pharmaceutical method with physical stabilization for post-VATS pain control. The study aims to investigate the feasibility of physical stabilization as a surrogate method for pain control. The single-blinded, randomized-controlled trial recruited the patients into physical stabilization group and standard care group after VATS. The patients in the intervention group tied a thoracic belt for all day, while the control group did not. Both groups had intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) and on-demand oral analgesics. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale for pain at the 6th, 24th and 48th hour post-VATS and at the hospital discharge. There were 18 patients assigned to the interventional group and 18 patients assigned to the control group. Four patients in the control group were dropped out from the study. Physical stabilization was found to enhance the analgesic effect post-operative 24-48 h compared to standard care (Difference of VAS: 1.11 ± 0.68 v.s. 0.5 ± 0.86, p = 0.031). It had no effect on the dose of IVPCA or the use of oral analgesic agents. No complications direct to the thoracic belt or adverse outcome from the surgery were found in the study. Physical stabilization with thoracic belt to patients receiving VATS benefits to pain control, especially between the 24th and 48th hour post-VATS. Clinical Trial Registry number: NCT04735614.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39277837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.