Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39277822›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

Self-Reported Perceptions of Patients and Staff on Participation and Verbal and Social Interactions in High-Security Forensic Psychiatric Care in Sweden.

Andreas Söderberg, Märta Wallinius, Christian Munthe, Ulrica Hörberg, Mikael Rask

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas SöderbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-4771
Märta WalliniusDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0530-9560
Christian MuntheDepartment of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-960X
Ulrica HörbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-5359
Mikael RaskDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-7102

Funding

Department of Research and Development, Region Kronoberg 2022-975691Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärdthe Regional Forensic Psychiatric Clinic in Växjöthe Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare 2018-01409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies suggest that experiences of patient participation, as described by both patients and staff, are associated with a significant caring relationship of high quality.

aimThis study aimed to investigate staffs' and patients' self-reported perceptions on participation and the frequency and importance of verbal and social interactions in high-security forensic psychiatry.

methodThe questionnaire Verbal and Social Interactions (VSI) was used together with the subscale Participation from Quality in Psychiatric Care (QPC). The study was conducted at a large forensic psychiatric clinic in Sweden.

resultsStaff and patients rated the frequency of VSI differently while reporting the same perceived degree of patient participation. All categories of VSI were significantly correlated with perceived level of participation with medium or small effect size for the patients. DISCUSSION: Patients' perceived participation seems to depend on verbal and social interaction within the specific categories 'Showing interest in the patients' feelings, experiences, and behavior' and 'Helping the patients establish structure and routines in their everyday life'. There was, however, a negative association for the latter. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results give a better understanding of what kind of interactions that affect patients' perceived level of participation. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Patient participant is a prioritised area for development in forensic psychiatry. The study contributes to a better understanding of what types of interactions that affect the perceived level of participation, while at the same time, it shows important similarities and differences between patient and staff perspectives.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelForensic PsychiatryPatient ParticipationSocial InteractionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSwedenYoung Adultforensic psychiatrymental health settingsquantitative methodology

Identifiers

PMID39277822
PMCPMC11891410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.