Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39277770›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2024

Annotation of epilepsy clinic letters for natural language processing.

Beata Fonferko-Shadrach, Huw Strafford, Carys Jones, Russell A Khan, Sharon Brown, Jenny Edwards, Jonathan Hawken, Luke E Shrimpton, Catharine P White, Robert Powell and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Beata Fonferko-Shadrach *Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK. b.fonferko-shadrach@swansea.ac.uk.
Huw Strafford *Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Carys JonesSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Russell A KhanSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Sharon BrownNeurology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Jenny EdwardsNeurology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Jonathan HawkenNeurology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Luke E ShrimptonNeurology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Catharine P WhiteSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Robert PowellSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Inder M S SawhneySwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
William O Pickrell *Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Arron S Lacey *Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) is increasingly being used to extract structured information from unstructured text to assist clinical decision-making and aid healthcare research. The availability of expert-annotated documents for the development and validation of NLP applications is limited. We created synthetic clinical documents to address this, and to validate the Extraction of Epilepsy Clinical Text version 2 (ExECTv2) NLP pipeline.

methodsWe created 200 synthetic clinic letters based on hospital outpatient consultations with epilepsy specialists. The letters were double annotated by trained clinicians and researchers according to agreed guidelines. We used the annotation tool, Markup, with an epilepsy concept list based on the Unified Medical Language System ontology. All annotations were reviewed, and a gold standard set of annotations was agreed and used to validate the performance of ExECTv2.

resultsThe overall inter-annotator agreement (IAA) between the two sets of annotations produced a per item F1 score of 0.73. Validating ExECTv2 using the gold standard gave an overall F1 score of 0.87 per item, and 0.90 per letter.

conclusionThe synthetic letters, annotations, and annotation guidelines have been made freely available. To our knowledge, this is the first publicly available set of annotated epilepsy clinic letters and guidelines that can be used for NLP researchers with minimum epilepsy knowledge. The IAA results show that clinical text annotation tasks are difficult and require a gold standard to be arranged by researcher consensus. The results for ExECTv2, our automated epilepsy NLP pipeline, extracted detailed epilepsy information from unstructured epilepsy letters with more accuracy than human annotators, further confirming the utility of NLP for clinical and research applications.

Indexed as

EpilepsyNatural Language ProcessingData CurationHumansAnnotation guidelinesEpilepsyGold standardNatural language processingSynthetic letters

Identifiers

PMID39277770
PMCPMC11402197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.