Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39277700›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Investigating the potential of waste glass in paver block production using RSM.

Bhukya Govardhan Naik, G Nakkeeran, Dipankar Roy, George Uwadiegwu Alaneme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bhukya Govardhan NaikDepartment of Civil Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, 517325, Andhra Pradesh, India.
G NakkeeranDepartment of Civil Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, 517325, Andhra Pradesh, India. drnakkeerang@mits.ac.in.
Dipankar RoyDepartment of Civil Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, 517325, Andhra Pradesh, India.
George Uwadiegwu AlanemeDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda. alanemeg@kiu.ac.ug.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4863-7628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global surge in glass waste generation, exceeding 130 million tons annually, presents a pressing environmental issue, compounded by inadequate recycling practices, it is concerning that the global recycling rate for glass waste is below 50%. This research investigates the utilization of WG as a FA substitute in paver block to mitigate the ecological footprint of conventional paver block while enhancing its mechanical properties. WG's unique characteristics, such as high silica content and impermeability, make it a promising alternative. A comprehensive experimental approach, including tests like water absorption, dry density, workability, compressive strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and rebound hammer, demonstrated WG's potential to improve concrete's durability and performance. For instance, a 40% WGA replacement reduced the absorption rate 12%, while 20% WGA incorporation-maintained strength properties close to the control mix, with compressive strengths up to 30.80 MPa at 28 days. Employing RSM as predictive models, the study showed R

Indexed as

Alternative new building materialsFine aggregateHardened propertiesMachine learningPredictionRSMSustainabilityWaste glass

Identifiers

PMID39277700
PMCPMC11401851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.