Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39277683›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Variational Bayes machine learning for risk adjustment of general outcome indicators with examples in urology.

Harvey Jia Wei Koh, Dragan Gašević, David Rankin, Stephane Heritier, Mark Frydenberg, Stella Talic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Harvey Jia Wei KohCentre for Learning Analytics, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4304-2783
Dragan GaševićCentre for Learning Analytics, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
David RankinDigital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stephane HeritierSchool of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mark FrydenbergCabrini Healthcare, Malvern, VIC, Australia.
Stella TalicCentre for Learning Analytics, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. stella.talic@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk adjustment is often necessary for outcome quality indicators (QIs) to provide fair and accurate feedback to healthcare professionals. However, traditional risk adjustment models are generally oversimplified and not equipped to disentangle complex factors influencing outcomes that are out of a healthcare professional's control. We present VIRGO, a novel variational Bayes model trained on routinely collected, large administrative datasets to risk-adjust outcome QIs. VIRGO uses detailed demographics, diagnosis, and procedure codes to provide individualized risk adjustment and explanations on patient factors affecting outcomes. VIRGO achieves state-of-the-art on external datasets and features capabilities of uncertainty expression, explainable features, and counterfactual analysis capabilities. VIRGO facilitates risk adjustment by explaining how patient factors led to adverse outcomes and expresses the uncertainty of each prediction, allowing healthcare professionals to not only explore patient factors with unexplained variance that are associated with worse outcomes but also reflect on the quality of their clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID39277683
PMCPMC11401950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.