Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39277633›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Plant diversity drives positive microbial associations in the rhizosphere enhancing carbon use efficiency in agricultural soils.

Luiz A Domeignoz-Horta, Seraina L Cappelli, Rashmi Shrestha, Stephanie Gerin, Annalea K Lohila, Jussi Heinonsalo, Daniel B Nelson, Ansgar Kahmen, Pengpeng Duan, David Sebag and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rhizosphere Microbial Effects on Soil Quality ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luiz A Domeignoz-HortaDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. luiz.domeignoz-horta@inrae.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4618-6253
Seraina L CappelliDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8141-404X
Rashmi ShresthaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Stephanie GerinFinnish Meteorological Institute, Climate System Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Annalea K LohilaFinnish Meteorological Institute, Climate System Research, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-672X
Jussi HeinonsaloDepartment of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Daniel B NelsonDepartment of Environmental Sciences - Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-7770
Ansgar KahmenDepartment of Environmental Sciences - Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pengpeng DuanKey Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, China.
David SebagIFP Energies Nouvelles, Earth Sciences and Environmental Technologies Division, Rueil-Malmaison, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6446-6921
Eric VerrecchiaInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Faculty of Geosciences and the Environment, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7105-256X
Anna-Liisa LaineResearch Centre for Ecological Change, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0703-5850

Funding

Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) STN MULTA; 327222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanding and intensifying agriculture has led to a loss of soil carbon. As agroecosystems cover over 40% of Earth's land surface, they must be part of the solution put in action to mitigate climate change. Development of efficient management practices to maximize soil carbon retention is currently limited, in part, by a poor understanding of how plants, which input carbon to soil, and microbes, which determine its fate there, interact. Here we implement a diversity gradient by intercropping undersown species with barley in a large field trial, ranging from one to eight undersown species. We find that increasing plant diversity strengthens positive associations within the rhizosphere soil microbial community in relation to negative associations. These associations, in turn, enhance community carbon use efficiency. Jointly, our results highlight how increasing plant diversity in agriculture can be used as a management strategy to enhance carbon retention potential in agricultural soils.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiodiversityCarbonRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologyHordeumMicrobiotaPlant RootsPlantsCarbonSoil

Identifiers

PMID39277633
PMCPMC11401882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.