Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39277199›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Addressing diagnostic uncertainty and excellence in emergency care-from multicountry policy analysis to communication practice in Australian emergency departments: a multimethod study protocol.

Maria R Dahm, Laura J Chien, Jen Morris, Lucy Lutze, Sam Scanlan, Carmel Crock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond a Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient and Caregiver Expectations About Emergency Department Visits Amid Uncertainty.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria R DahmInstitute for Communication in Health Care, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Maria.Dahm@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8067-4600
Laura J ChienInstitute for Communication in Health Care, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-0844
Jen MorrisInstitute for Communication in Health Care, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Lucy LutzeHornsby and Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia.
Sam ScanlanCanberra Health Services, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Carmel CrockThe Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunication failings may compromise the diagnostic process and pose a risk to quality of care and patient safety. With a focus on emergency care settings, this project aims to examine the critical role and impact of communication in the diagnostic process, including in diagnosis-related health and research policy, and diagnostic patient-clinician interactions in emergency departments (EDs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project uses a qualitatively driven multimethod design integrating findings from two research studies to gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of context and communication on diagnostic excellence from diverse perspectives. Study 1 will map the diagnostic policy and practice landscape in Australia, New Zealand and the USA through qualitative expert interviews and policy analysis. Study 2 will investigate the communication of uncertainty in diagnostic interactions through a qualitative ethnography of two metropolitan Australian ED sites incorporating observations, field notes, video-recorded interactions, semistructured interviews and written medical documentation, including linguistic analysis of recorded diagnostic interactions and written documentation. This study will also feature a description of clinician, patient and carer perspectives on, and involvement in, interpersonal diagnostic interactions and will provide crucial new insights into the impact of communicating diagnostic uncertainty for these groups. Project-spanning patient and stakeholder involvement strategies will build research capacity among healthcare consumers via educational workshops, engage with community stakeholders in analysis and build consensus among stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project has received ethical approvals from the Human Research Ethics Committee at ACT Health, Northern Sydney Local Health District and the Australian National University. Findings will be disseminated to academic peers, clinicians and healthcare consumers, health policy-makers and the general public, using local and international academic and consumer channels (journals, evidence briefs and conferences) and outreach activities (workshops and seminars).

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalQualitative ResearchAustraliaHealth PolicyHumansNew ZealandPhysician-Patient RelationsPolicy MakingResearch DesignUncertaintyUnited StatesACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEHealth policyHealth ServicesQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSocial Interaction

Identifiers

PMID39277199
PMCPMC11404230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.