ArticleJournal of biomechanics2024
Optimizing distal and proximal splenic artery embolization with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic embolic agents for targeted drug delivery in transcatheter therapies: a review.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations to Inform Cancer Therapeutics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Computational studies on visceral artery lesions and aortic pathologies involving visceral branches: a comprehensive review for the clinician.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Image-guided embolization using Ta@Ca-Alg microspheres with optimized mechanical performance.Biomaterials science · 2025Article
- Oxidative Stress, Ferroptosis Indicators, and Nicorandil Efficacy in STEMI Patients During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Splenic artery embolization (SAE) has become a favored alternative to splenectomy, offering a less invasive intervention for injured spleens while preserving spleen function. However, our understanding of the role that hemodynamics plays during embolization remains limited. In this study, we utilized patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to study distal and proximal embolization strategies commonly used in SAE. Detailed 3D computer models were constructed considering the descending aorta, various major visceral arteries, and the iliac arteries. Subsequently, the blood flow and pressure associated with different coil placement locations in proximal embolization were studied considering the collateral vessels. Coil induced variations in pressure fields were quantified and compared to baseline. The coil induced flow stagnation was also quantified with particle residence time. Distal embolization was modeled with Lagrangian particle tracking and the effect of particle size, release location, and timing on embolization outcome was studied. Our findings highlight the crucial role of collateral vessels in maintaining blood supply to the spleen following proximal embolization. It was demonstrated that coil location can affect distal pressure and that strategic coil placement guided by patient-specific CFD simulations can further reduce this pressure as desired. Additionally, the results point to the critical roles that particle size, release timing, and location play in distal embolization. Our study provides an early attempt to use patient-specific computer modeling for optimizing embolization strategies and ultimately improving patient outcomes during SAE procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.