Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39276215›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Trends and incidence of reported events associated with ureteral stents: an analysis of the food and drug administration's manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database.

Riccardo Lombardo, Alessio Guidotti, Beatrice Turchi, Antonio Nacchia, Giuseppe Santoro, Matteo Romagnoli, Antonio Franco, Giorgia Tema, Giorgio Guarnotta, Antonio Cicione and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Riccardo LombardoDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy. rlombardo@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2890-3159
Alessio GuidottiDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Beatrice TurchiDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Antonio NacchiaDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SantoroDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Matteo RomagnoliDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Antonio FrancoDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Giorgia TemaDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Giorgio GuarnottaDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Antonio CicioneDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Giorgio FrancoDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Andrea TubaroDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Cosimo De NunzioDepartment of Urology, 'Sapienza', Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAim of this study is to summarize medical device reports (MDRs) between 2012 and 2022 relating to ureteral stents within the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database maintained by The Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

methodsMAUDE was analyzed for all MDRs relating to each FDA-approved ureteral stent. Event descriptions were reviewed and characterized into specific event types. Outcome measures include specific ureteral stent and reported events as detailed by the MDRs. Data is presented as number of specific event/total events. Pooled Relative risk was used to compare data.

results2652 reports were retrieved in 10 years and a progressive rise in reported events was recorded. 831/2652 (31%) were reported as injury while 1810/2652 (68%) as malfunction of the ureteral stent and 4 events of death. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were stent break (627/2652: 23%); material problems (384/2652: 14%); calcification (222/2652: 8%); difficulty to insert, advance or remove the device (155/2652: 6%). Bard stents were associated with most material problems (19%), Resonance stents were associated with most difficulty to insert, advance or remove the device (9%) and calcification (15%) while filiform double pigtail stent set were associated with most breakage reports (56%) when compared to the other stents (PRR > 1, p < 0,05).

conclusionsAccording to MAUDE database the most frequent complications related to ureteral stents are breakage, material problems, calcification and difficulty to insert/advance/remove the device. As well Resonance ureteral stents seem to be associated with a higher risk of device problems.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualStentsUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationUreterEquipment FailureHumansIncidenceProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingProsthesis FailureUnited StatesAdverse eventsMAUDE databaseUreteral stent complicationsUreteral stentsUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.