Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39276154›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Evaluation of corn fermented protein on the fecal microbiome of cats.

Logan R Kilburn-Kappeler, Tyler Doerksen, Andrea Lu, Rachel M Palinski, Nanyan Lu, Charles G Aldrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Logan R Kilburn-KappelerDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Tyler DoerksenVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Andrea LuVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Rachel M PalinskiVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Nanyan LuBioinformatics Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Charles G AldrichDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8983-3652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-products from the ethanol industry, such as distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), can provide alternative protein sources for pet food. Corn fermented protein (CFP) is produced using postfermentation technology to split the protein and yeast from fiber prior to drying. This results in a higher protein ingredient compared to DDGS, increasing its appeal for pet food. In addition, the substantial yeast component, at approximately 20% to 25%, may promote gut health through modulation of the microbiome and the production of short-chain fatty acids. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of CFP on the fecal microbiome of cats. The 4 experimental diets included a control with no yeast (T1) and diets containing either 3.5% brewer's dried yeast (T2), 2.5% brewer's dried yeast plus 17.5% DDGS (T3), or 17.5% CFP (T4). All diets except T1 were formulated to contain 3.5% yeast. Diets were fed to adult cats (n = 11) in an incomplete 4 × 4 replicated Latin square design. Cats were adapted to diet for 9 d followed by a 5-d total fecal collection. During each collection period, fresh fecal samples from each cat were collected and stored at -80 °C until analysis. Fresh fecal samples (n = 44) were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Raw sequences were processed through Mothur (v.1.44.1). Community diversity was evaluated in R (v4.0.3). Relative abundance was analyzed within the 50 most abundant operational taxonomic unitsusing a mixed model of SAS (v9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Diet was the fixed effect and cat and period were random effects. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05. Alpha-diversity indices (Observed, Chao1, Shannon, Simpson) and beta-diversity metric (principal coordinate analysis) were similar for all treatments. Predominant phyla were Firmicutes (66%), Bacteroidetes (25%), Actinobacteria (8%), Proteobacteria (0.64%), and Desulfobacteria (0.54%). The relative abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria was lower (P < 0.05) for T3 compared to T4 and T2, respectively. On a more specific phylogenic level, 17 genera resulted in differences (P < 0.05) among dietary treatments. Overall, this data indicates that compared to traditional yeast and distillers dried grains, CFP did not alter the overall diversity of the fecal microbiome of healthy adult cats over a 14-d period.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietFecesFermentationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeZea maysAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaCatsFemaleMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingfelineyeast

Identifiers

PMID39276154
PMCPMC11537796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.