ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2024
Recognition of Traumatic Brain Injury as a Chronic Condition: A Commentary.
Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of traumatic brain injury with incident cardiovascular disease: Results from the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Future Directions and Evolution Strategies for the Clinical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Transient Association Between Elevated NSE and Reduced fT3 Levels Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A 12-Month Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The First Year Matters: Lifestyle Behaviors and Five-Year Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Accumulation After Traumatic Brain Injury.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Good Recovery, Poor Participation? A Secondary Analysis of the Dissociation Between Global Disability and Real-Life Participation Five Years After Traumatic Brain Injury.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Follow up rates and patient interest in clinical care after mild traumatic brain injury presenting to a level 1 trauma center: a TRACK-TBI prospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many clinicians believe that residual impairments due to traumatic brain injury (TBI) are static once initial recovery has plateaued. That is, the effects of the injury are not expected to change significantly over the remainder of a person's life. This assumption has been called into question by several independent longitudinal studies showing that the long-term course of TBI may be better characterized as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.