ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024
Integration of proteomic data with genome-scale metabolic models: A methodological overview.
Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- EINN: An enzyme-informed neural network guided by an enzyme-constrained genome-scale metabolic model.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027Article
- Thermo-flux: generation and analysis of thermodynamic-stoichiometric metabolic network models.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Transcriptome-driven constraint-based modelling reveals metabolic targets for ovarian cancer.Cancer & metabolism · 2026Article
- COBRA-k: A powerful framework bridging constraint-based and kinetic metabolic modeling.Science advances · 2026Article
- Modelling reliable metabolic phenotypes by analysing the context-specific transcriptomics data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Systems biology and microbiome innovations for personalized diabetic retinopathy management.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Review
- Article
- Integration of proteomic data with genome-scale metabolic models: A methodological overview.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of proteomics data with constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) models plays a pivotal role in understanding the relationship between genotype and phenotype and bridges the gap between genome-level phenomena and functional adaptations. Integrating a generic genome-scale model with information on proteins enables generation of a context-specific metabolic model which improves the accuracy of model prediction. This review explores methodologies for incorporating proteomics data into genome-scale models. Available methods are grouped into four distinct categories based on their approach to integrate proteomics data and their depth of modeling. Within each category section various methods are introduced in chronological order of publication demonstrating the progress of this field. Furthermore, challenges and potential solutions to further progress are outlined, including the limited availability of appropriate in vitro data, experimental enzyme turnover rates, and the trade-off between model accuracy, computational tractability, and data scarcity. In conclusion, methods employing simpler approaches demand fewer kinetic and omics data, consequently leading to a less complex mathematical problem and reduced computational expenses. On the other hand, approaches that delve deeper into cellular mechanisms and aim to create detailed mathematical models necessitate more extensive kinetic and omics data, resulting in a more complex and computationally demanding problem. However, in some cases, this increased cost can be justified by the potential for more precise predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.