Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275984›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

Learning to quantify uncertainty in off-target activity for CRISPR guide RNAs.

Furkan Özden, Peter Minary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Furkan ÖzdenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9448-3183
Peter MinaryDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1779-6741

Funding

Google
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based genome editing technologies have revolutionised the field of molecular biology, offering unprecedented opportunities for precise genetic manipulation. However, off-target effects remain a significant challenge, potentially leading to unintended consequences and limiting the applicability of CRISPR-based genome editing technologies in clinical settings. Current literature predominantly focuses on point predictions for off-target activity, which may not fully capture the range of possible outcomes and associated risks. Here, we present crispAI, a neural network architecture-based approach for predicting uncertainty estimates for off-target cleavage activity, providing a more comprehensive risk assessment and facilitating improved decision-making in single guide RNA (sgRNA) design. Our approach makes use of the count noise model Zero Inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) to model the uncertainty in the off-target cleavage activity data. In addition, we present the first-of-its-kind genome-wide sgRNA efficiency score, crispAI-aggregate, enabling prioritization among sgRNAs with similar point aggregate predictions by providing richer information compared to existing aggregate scores. We show that uncertainty estimates of our approach are calibrated and its predictive performance is superior to the state-of-the-art in silico off-target cleavage activity prediction methods. The tool and the trained models are available at https://github.com/furkanozdenn/crispr-offtarget-uncertainty.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerUncertaintyRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID39275984
PMCPMC11472043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.