Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275979›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2025

Setting up an institutional OMERO environment for bioimage data: Perspectives from both facility staff and users.

Anett Jannasch, Silke Tulok, Chukwuebuka William Okafornta, Thomas Kugel, Michele Bortolomeazzi, Tom Boissonnet, Christian Schmidt, Andy Vogelsang, Claudia Dittfeld, Sems-Malte Tugtekin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anett JannaschDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Heart Centre Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8047-2774
Silke TulokCore Facility Cellular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-1473-6427
Chukwuebuka William OkaforntaExperimental Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-1254
Thomas KugelIT Department, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michele BortolomeazziSingle-Cell Open Lab, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5805-5774
Tom BoissonnetCenter for Advanced Imaging, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-9467
Christian SchmidtEnabling Technology Department, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9568-895X
Andy VogelsangCore Facility Cellular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-8722-9918
Claudia DittfeldDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Heart Centre Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-6414
Sems-Malte TugtekinDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Heart Centre Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-7321-2490
Klaus MatschkeDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Heart Centre Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4544-3967
Leocadia PaliulisBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8244-7548
Carola ThomasInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk LindemannInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-4223
Gunar FabigExperimental Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-0978
Thomas Müller-ReichertCore Facility Cellular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-1436

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 258577783Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 282354882Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 462231789Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 501864659Freistaat Sachsen 100367226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern bioimaging core facilities at research institutions are essential for managing and maintaining high-end instruments, providing training and support for researchers in experimental design, image acquisition and data analysis. An important task for these facilities is the professional management of complex multidimensional bioimaging data, which are often produced in large quantity and very different file formats. This article details the process that led to successfully implementing the OME Remote Objects system (OMERO) for bioimage-specific research data management (RDM) at the Core Facility Cellular Imaging (CFCI) at the Technische Universität Dresden (TU Dresden). Ensuring compliance with the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles, we outline here the challenges that we faced in adapting data handling and storage to a new RDM system. These challenges included the introduction of a standardised group-specific naming convention, metadata curation with tagging and Key-Value pairs, and integration of existing image processing workflows. By sharing our experiences, this article aims to provide insights and recommendations for both individual researchers and educational institutions intending to implement OMERO as a management system for bioimaging data. We showcase how tailored decisions and structured approaches lead to successful outcomes in RDM practices. Lay description: Modern bioimaging facilities at research institutions are crucial for managing advanced equipment and supporting scientists in their research. These facilities help with designing experiments, capturing images, and analyzing data. One of their key tasks is organizing and managing large amounts of complex image data, which often comes in various file formats and are difficult to handle. This article explains how the Core Facility Cellular Imaging (CFCI) at Technische Universität Dresden successfully implemented a specialized system called OMERO. With this system it is possible to manage and organize bioimaging data sustainably in a way that they are findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable according the FAIR principles. We describe the practical implementation process on exemplary projects within scientific research and medical education. We discuss the challenges we faced, such as creating a standard way to name files, organizing important information about the images (known as metadata), and ensuring that existing image processing methods could work with the new system. By sharing our experience, we aim to offer practical advice and recommendations for other researchers and institutions interested in using OMERO for managing their bioimaging data. We highlight how careful planning and structured approaches can lead to successful data management practices, making it easier for researchers to store, access, and reuse their valuable data.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedData ManagementHumansbioimaging dataFAIR principlesimaging facilityOMEROresearch data management (RDM)

Identifiers

PMID39275979
PMCPMC11629930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.