ArticleJournal of microscopy2025
Setting up an institutional OMERO environment for bioimage data: Perspectives from both facility staff and users.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards a systems-level view of the microtubule cytoskeleton and its functions in physiology and disease.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- Data Management Workflow for FAIR Sharing of Bioimaging Datasets in Plasma Medicine.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A fluorescence lifetime separation approach for FLIM live-cell imaging.Journal of microscopy · 2026Article
- Setting up an institutional OMERO environment for bioimage data: Perspectives from both facility staff and users.Journal of microscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern bioimaging core facilities at research institutions are essential for managing and maintaining high-end instruments, providing training and support for researchers in experimental design, image acquisition and data analysis. An important task for these facilities is the professional management of complex multidimensional bioimaging data, which are often produced in large quantity and very different file formats. This article details the process that led to successfully implementing the OME Remote Objects system (OMERO) for bioimage-specific research data management (RDM) at the Core Facility Cellular Imaging (CFCI) at the Technische Universität Dresden (TU Dresden). Ensuring compliance with the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles, we outline here the challenges that we faced in adapting data handling and storage to a new RDM system. These challenges included the introduction of a standardised group-specific naming convention, metadata curation with tagging and Key-Value pairs, and integration of existing image processing workflows. By sharing our experiences, this article aims to provide insights and recommendations for both individual researchers and educational institutions intending to implement OMERO as a management system for bioimaging data. We showcase how tailored decisions and structured approaches lead to successful outcomes in RDM practices. Lay description: Modern bioimaging facilities at research institutions are crucial for managing advanced equipment and supporting scientists in their research. These facilities help with designing experiments, capturing images, and analyzing data. One of their key tasks is organizing and managing large amounts of complex image data, which often comes in various file formats and are difficult to handle. This article explains how the Core Facility Cellular Imaging (CFCI) at Technische Universität Dresden successfully implemented a specialized system called OMERO. With this system it is possible to manage and organize bioimaging data sustainably in a way that they are findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable according the FAIR principles. We describe the practical implementation process on exemplary projects within scientific research and medical education. We discuss the challenges we faced, such as creating a standard way to name files, organizing important information about the images (known as metadata), and ensuring that existing image processing methods could work with the new system. By sharing our experience, we aim to offer practical advice and recommendations for other researchers and institutions interested in using OMERO for managing their bioimaging data. We highlight how careful planning and structured approaches can lead to successful data management practices, making it easier for researchers to store, access, and reuse their valuable data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.