SynthesisTuberkuloz ve toraks2024
Shared and unique transcriptomic signature genes and pathways among biopsy, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bronchoalveolar lavage samples in IPF patients revealed using comparative meta-transcriptome analysis.
Synthesis in Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affects the tissue surrounding the alveoli and occurs when the lung tissue becomes thick and stiff for unknown reasons. Clinical findings are fairly well settled, but the molecular mechanisms of IPF are still poorly known. Materials and Methods: To further our understanding, we collected publicly available transcriptome dataset from IPF cohorts, grouped them according to sampling method [bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), biopsy, blood], and performed comparative meta-transcriptome study to (I) unravel key pathways (II), set out differences in discovered genes, pathways, and functional annotation with respect to the sampling method, and (III) find biomarkers for early diagnosis. Result: The resulting lists are also compared with DisGeNet reported genes, earlier work, and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathways. Several pathways are shared among BAL and biopsy samples while blood samples point to alternative pathways, indicating the noise in information obtained from these samples. Conclusions: Common to all sampling methods, interleukin-10 pathway and extracellular signaling pathways are pointed as further targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.