Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275929›Full record

ArticleTuberkuloz ve toraks2024

Characteristics of patients with symptomatic and incidental pulmonary thromboembolism.

Başak Gönen, Pervin Hanci, Osman Nuri Hatipoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Başak GönenDepartment of Chest Disease, Trakya University Hospital, Edirne, Türkiye.
Pervin HanciDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Chest Disease, Trakya University Hospital, Edirne, Türkiye.
Osman Nuri HatipoğluDepartment of Chest Disease, Trakya University Hospital, Edirne, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) has a wide range of clinical presentations. With the advances in computed tomography (CT) technology and easier access to CT, the incidence of incidentally diagnosed cases of PTE has increased. The main aim of our study was to determine the frequency of patients incidentally diagnosed with PTE and whether these patients differ from patients with symptomatic PTE in terms of case characteristics. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed the charts of 148 patients with PTE diagnosed and treated in 2022. Demographic characteristics, thrombus localisation, risk factors, and treatment modalities were compared between symptomatic patients with clinically suspected PTE and patients with incidentally diagnosed PTE by imaging methods performed for other purposes without clinically suspected PTE. Result: Out of 148 patients with PTE, 42 (28.3%) were diagnosed incidentally. The rate of concomitant malignancy was significantly higher in patients with incidental PTE (54.8%) than in patients with symptomatic PTE (28.3%) (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between symptomatic and incidental PTE patients in terms of the pulmonary artery segment in which the thrombus was located (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In our patient group, approximately one out of four patients diagnosed with PTE were incidentally diagnosed. Patients with malignancies may not have symptoms suspicious for PTE or their symptoms may go unrecognized.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsPulmonary EmbolismTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPulmonary ArteryRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTurkey

Identifiers

PMID39275929
PMCPMC13138777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.