Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275739›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Phasor-Based Myoelectric Synergy Features: A Fast Hand-Crafted Feature Extraction Scheme for Boosting Performance in Gait Phase Recognition.

Andrea Tigrini, Rami Mobarak, Alessandro Mengarelli, Rami N Khushaba, Ali H Al-Timemy, Federica Verdini, Ennio Gambi, Sandro Fioretti, Laura Burattini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea TigriniDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1600-2137
Rami MobarakDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-3929-084X
Alessandro MengarelliDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6087-6763
Rami N KhushabaTransport for NSW Alexandria, Haymarket, NSW 2008, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8528-8979
Ali H Al-TimemyBiomedical Engineering Department, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10066, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-8896
Federica VerdiniDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4252-3224
Ennio GambiDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6852-8483
Sandro FiorettiDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7783-3065
Laura BurattiniDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9474-7046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait phase recognition systems based on surface electromyographic signals (EMGs) are crucial for developing advanced myoelectric control schemes that enhance the interaction between humans and lower limb assistive devices. However, machine learning models used in this context, such as Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), typically experience performance degradation when modeling the gait cycle with more than just stance and swing phases. This study introduces a generalized phasor-based feature extraction approach (PHASOR) that captures spatial myoelectric features to improve the performance of LDA and SVM in gait phase recognition. A publicly available dataset of 40 subjects was used to evaluate PHASOR against state-of-the-art feature sets in a five-phase gait recognition problem. Additionally, fully data-driven deep learning architectures, such as Rocket and Mini-Rocket, were included for comparison. The separability index (SI) and mean semi-principal axis (MSA) analyses showed mean SI and MSA metrics of 7.7 and 0.5, respectively, indicating the proposed approach's ability to effectively decode gait phases through EMG activity. The SVM classifier demonstrated the highest accuracy of 82% using a five-fold leave-one-trial-out testing approach, outperforming Rocket and Mini-Rocket. This study confirms that in gait phase recognition based on EMG signals, novel and efficient muscle synergy information feature extraction schemes, such as PHASOR, can compete with deep learning approaches that require greater processing time for feature extraction and classification.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyGaitSupport Vector MachineAdultAlgorithmsDeep LearningDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedassistive devicesdeep learningEMGfeature extractiongaitlower limbmyoelectric control

Identifiers

PMID39275739
PMCPMC11397962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.