ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Computer-Simulated Virtual Image Datasets to Train Machine Learning Models for Non-Invasive Fish Detection in Recirculating Aquaculture.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) can assist producers to better manage recirculating aquaculture systems (RASs). ML is a data-intensive process, and model performance primarily depends on the quality of training data. Relatively higher fish density and water turbidity in intensive RAS culture produce major challenges in acquiring high-quality underwater image data. Additionally, the manual image annotation involved in model training can be subjective, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. Therefore, the presented study aimed to simulate fish schooling behavior for RAS conditions and investigate the feasibility of using computer-simulated virtual images to train a robust fish detection model. Additionally, to expedite the model training and automate the virtual image annotation, a process flow was developed. The 'virtual model' performances were compared with models trained on real-world images and combinations of real and virtual images. The results of the study indicate that the virtual model trained solely with computer-simulated images could not perform satisfactorily (mAP = 62.8%, F1 score = 0.61) to detect fish in a real RAS environment; however, replacing a small number of the virtual images with real images in the training dataset significantly improved the model's performance. The M6 mixed model trained with 630 virtual and 70 real images (virtual-to-real image ratio: 90:10) achieved mAP and F1 scores of 91.8% and 0.87, respectively. Furthermore, the training time cost for the M6 model was seven times shorter than that for the 'real model'. Overall, the virtual simulation approach exhibited great promise in rapidly training a reliable fish detection model for RAS operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.