ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Comprehensive Review of Hardware Acceleration Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks for EEG Signals.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Performance in Working Memory During the Waking Period by Applying a Convolutional Neural Network to EEG Data in the N-Back Task: A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence for GNSS Multipath LSTM Training Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper comprehensively reviews hardware acceleration techniques and the deployment of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for analyzing electroencephalogram (EEG) signals across various application areas, including emotion classification, motor imagery, epilepsy detection, and sleep monitoring. Previous reviews on EEG have mainly focused on software solutions. However, these reviews often overlook key challenges associated with hardware implementation, such as scenarios that require a small size, low power, high security, and high accuracy. This paper discusses the challenges and opportunities of hardware acceleration for wearable EEG devices by focusing on these aspects. Specifically, this review classifies EEG signal features into five groups and discusses hardware implementation solutions for each category in detail, providing insights into the most suitable hardware acceleration strategies for various application scenarios. In addition, it explores the complexity of efficient CNN architectures for EEG signals, including techniques such as pruning, quantization, tensor decomposition, knowledge distillation, and neural architecture search. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that combines CNN hardware solutions with EEG signal processing. By providing a comprehensive analysis of current challenges and a roadmap for future research, this paper provides a new perspective on the ongoing development of hardware-accelerated EEG systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.