Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275652›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Remote and Proximal Sensors Data Fusion: Digital Twins in Irrigation Management Zoning.

Hugo Rodrigues, Marcos B Ceddia, Wagner Tassinari, Gustavo M Vasques, Ziany N Brandão, João P S Morais, Ronaldo P Oliveira, Matheus L Neves, Sílvio R L Tavares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hugo RodriguesInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, McCarty Hall, 1604 McCarty Dr 1008, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8070-8126
Marcos B CeddiaAgroTechnologies and Sustainability Department, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8611-314X
Wagner TassinariDepartment of Mathematics, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22460-000, RJ, Brazil.
Gustavo M VasquesBrazilian Agricultural Research Company (Embrapa) Soils, Rio de Janeiro 22460-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9463-1898
Ziany N BrandãoBrazilian Agricultural Research Company (Embrapa) Cotton, Rua Osvaldo Cruz, 1143, Centenário 58428-095, CG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8165-6989
João P S MoraisBrazilian Agricultural Research Company (Embrapa) Cotton, Rua Osvaldo Cruz, 1143, Centenário 58428-095, CG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2190-248X
Ronaldo P OliveiraBrazilian Agricultural Research Company (Embrapa) Soils, Rio de Janeiro 22460-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-6932
Matheus L NevesPostgraduate Program in Agronomy-Soil Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.
Sílvio R L TavaresBrazilian Agricultural Research Company (Embrapa) Soils, Rio de Janeiro 22460-000, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 32.12.12.004.00.00Itaipu Binacional 45.000.32.537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific field of precision agriculture employs increasingly innovative techniques to optimize inputs, maximize profitability, and reduce environmental impact. However, obtaining a high number of soil samples is challenging in order to make precision agriculture viable. There is a trade-off between the amount of data needed and the time and resources spent to obtain these data compared to the accuracy of the maps produced with more or fewer points. In the present study, the research was based on an exhaustive dataset of apparent electrical conductivity (aEC) containing 3906 points distributed along 26 transects with spacing between each of up to 40 m, measured by the proximal soil sensor EM38-MK2, for a grain-producing area of 72 ha in São Paulo, Brazil. A second sparse dataset was simulated, showing only four transects with a 400 m distance and, in the end, only 162 aEC points. The aEC map via ordinary kriging (OK) from the grid with 26 transects was considered the reference, and two other mapping approaches were used to map aEC via sparse grid: kriging with external drift (KED) and geographically weighted regression (GWR). These last two methods allow the increment of auxiliary variables, such as those obtained by remote sensors that present spatial resolution compatible with the pivot scale, such as data from the Landsat-8, Aster, and Sentinel-2 satellites, as well as ten terrain covariates derived from the Alos Palsar digital elevation model. The KED method, when used with the sparse dataset, showed a relatively good fit to the aEC data (R

Indexed as

digital soil mappinggeographically weighted regressionpedometryspatial statistics

Identifiers

PMID39275652
PMCPMC11397833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.