Validity of an Inertial Measurement Unit System to Measure Lower Limb Kinematics at Point of Contact during Incremental High-Speed Running.

Lisa Wolski, Mark Halaki, Claire E Hiller, Evangelos Pappas, Alycia Fong Yan

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

Evaluating Sparse Inertial Measurement Unit Configurations for Inferring Treadmill Running Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Article
Utilising Inertial Measurement Units and Force-Velocity Profiling to Explore the Relationship Between Hamstring Strain Injury and Running Biomechanics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa WolskiFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.

Mark HalakiFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6721-6354

Claire E HillerFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.

Evangelos PappasFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.

Alycia Fong YanFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-2915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited validation for portable methods in evaluating high-speed running biomechanics, with inertial measurement unit (IMU) systems commonly used as wearables for this purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an IMU system in high-speed running compared to a 3D motion analysis system (MAS). One runner performed incremental treadmill running, from 12 to 18 km/h, on two separate days. Sagittal angles for the shank, knee, hip and pelvis were measured simultaneously with three IMUs and the MAS at the point of contact (POC), the timing when the foot initially hits the ground, as identified by IMU system acceleration, and compared to the POC identified via force plate. Agreement between the systems was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients, Pearson's

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityRunningAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleWearable Electronic Devicesaccelerometerbiomechanicsgaitmeasurementsensor

Identifiers

PMID39275629

DOI10.3390/s24175718

PMCPMC11398232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.