Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275615›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Fusion of PCA and ICA in Statistical Subset Analysis for Speech Emotion Recognition.

Rafael Kingeski, Elisa Henning, Aleksander S Paterno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rafael KingeskiCenter for Science and Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Joinville 89219-710, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-0826
Elisa HenningCenter of Technological Sciences, Department of Mathematics, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Rua Paulo Malschitzki, 200, Zona Industrial Norte, Joinville 89219-710, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7754-9451
Aleksander S PaternoCenter for Science and Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Joinville 89219-710, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9877-4850

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq 311829/2022-8Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) under Grant PROAP/AUXPE DS 1928/2023, Proc. 88881.898694/2023-01 88881.898694/2023-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech emotion recognition is key to many fields, including human-computer interaction, healthcare, and intelligent assistance. While acoustic features extracted from human speech are essential for this task, not all of them contribute to emotion recognition effectively. Thus, reduced numbers of features are required within successful emotion recognition models. This work aimed to investigate whether splitting the features into two subsets based on their distribution and then applying commonly used feature reduction methods would impact accuracy. Filter reduction was employed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). A set of features was investigated to determine whether the indiscriminate use of parametric feature reduction techniques affects the accuracy of emotion recognition. For this investigation, data from three databases-Berlin EmoDB, SAVEE, and RAVDES-were organized into subsets according to their distribution in applying both PCA and ICA. The results showed a reduction from 6373 features to 170 for the Berlin EmoDB database with an accuracy of 84.3%; a final size of 130 features for SAVEE, with a corresponding accuracy of 75.4%; and 150 features for RAVDESS, with an accuracy of 59.9%.

Indexed as

EmotionsPrincipal Component AnalysisSpeechAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansPattern Recognition, Automatedfeature selectionICAKruskal–WallisPCAspeech emotion recognitionSVM

Identifiers

PMID39275615
PMCPMC11398048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.