ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Comparative Performance Evaluation of YOLO-Type Detectors on a New Open Fire and Smoke Dataset.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- On Construction of Tibial Plateau Fracture Detection in Different Radiographic Views Using YOLO Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimizing hyperparameters of YOLOv10 for arson detection using advanced optimization algorithms.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper introduces a new FireAndSmoke open dataset comprising over 22,000 images and 93,000 distinct instances compiled from 1200 YouTube videos and public Internet resources. The scenes include separate and combined fire and smoke scenarios and a curated set of difficult cases representing real-life circumstances when specific image patches may be erroneously detected as fire/smoke presence. The dataset has been constructed using both static pictures and video sequences, covering day/night, indoor/outdoor, urban/industrial/forest, low/high resolution, and single/multiple instance cases. A rigorous selection, preprocessing, and labeling procedure has been applied, adhering to the findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability specifications described in the literature. The performances of the YOLO-type family of object detectors have been compared in terms of class-wise Precision, Recall, Mean Average Precision (mAP), and speed. Experimental results indicate the recently introduced YOLO10 model as the top performer, with 89% accuracy and a mAP@50 larger than 91%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.